Reporting health check
A focused assessment of priority reports, measures, refreshes, dependencies, ownership, and material failure patterns. A standalone Power BI health check is available when you need findings before committing to repair work.
Packaged engagement
Stabilize fragile reporting without assuming that every report, model, or platform must be replaced.
Good starting conditions
Scope variants
A focused assessment of priority reports, measures, refreshes, dependencies, ownership, and material failure patterns. A standalone Power BI health check is available when you need findings before committing to repair work.
Repair and release a prioritized reporting path with reconciliation, performance, access, deployment, and rollback evidence.
Classify reports and models to keep, repair, consolidate, replace, or retire, then sequence the approved work.
Concrete output
Reports, models, refreshes, dependencies, consumers, and failure patterns prioritized by business consequence.
Targeted repair at the source, transformation, semantic, refresh, access, or presentation layer.
Keep, improve, consolidate, replace, or retire decisions with owners and dependencies.
Expected performance, refresh, validation, deployment, and support behavior for the rescued scope.
Industry applications
The offer remains bounded while sources, measures, timing, access, and recurring decisions change by industry.
Stabilize recurring claims, census, workforce, finance, access, location, and quality reporting with visible reconciliation and access controls.
View industry contextRepair booking, occupancy, revenue, pace, forecast, and property reporting that depends on repeated manual preparation.
View industry contextConsolidate fragile location, sales, margin, labor, supply, and exception reporting without removing useful local context.
View industry contextImprove portfolio, close, consolidation, diligence, and recurring management reporting while preserving source and approval evidence.
View industry contextEntry requirements
Technical context
Boundaries
Poor fit
Questions
No. The first task is to locate the material failure. A repair, consolidation, selective replacement, or deliberate decision to keep the current platform may be the strongest result.
Yes. Performance and reliability often cross report design, DAX, semantic models, generated SQL, warehouse workloads, refresh, capacity, access, and release.
No. Work is prioritized by business consequence. Low-value duplication may be retired while important outputs are repaired and placed on a maintainable baseline.
The agreed reporting boundary should meet its refresh, interaction, reconciliation, access, deployment, rollback, and ownership expectations, with known defects and deferred work recorded.
Share the reporting system, business consequence, responsible team, and the constraint that needs attention.
Start with this offer